A test of your understanding of opposing views: can you state the other side's position so clearly and persuasively that its adherents would believe you genuinely hold it? Named by economist Bryan Caplan, inspired by Turing's test for machine intelligence.
Forces genuine engagement with opposing views rather than dismissing them based on who holds them. If you can't pass the ITT for a position, you don't understand it well enough to reject it. Counters the tendency to attack strawmen or dismiss arguments via ad hominem.
Loading examples...
Hover to see definition, click to view full details