F046 • Informal - Relevance/Appeals
Also known as: Argumentum ad Crumenam, Appeal to Money, Appeal to Prosperity, Argument from Wealth
We tend to associate wealth with competence, and expense with quality. When someone successful weighs in on a topic, or when a product carries a high price tag, something in us leans toward trust -- as if financial success were a kind of general-purpose credential. Appeal to Wealth is when money or status does the persuasive work that evidence should be doing.
Loading examples...
X is associated with wealth/expense; therefore X is true/better/correct
There is a reason we pay attention to wealth signals: in many contexts, financial success does correlate with some form of competence. A thriving restaurant probably does something right. An investor with a strong track record may understand markets. We use these signals as shortcuts, and they often work well enough. The trouble starts when we treat wealth as a universal indicator -- as if being rich means being right, or being expensive means being good. Wealth results from a tangled mix of skill, opportunity, timing, inheritance, and luck. A billionaire's views on technology may be genuinely informed, but that same person's views on nutrition or foreign policy carry no special weight. Similarly, a five-hundred-dollar face cream and a twenty-dollar one may contain identical ingredients. The price feels like information about quality, but often it is information about marketing. The heuristic is not foolish -- it just breaks down when we stop asking what, specifically, the money is evidence of.
| When cost reflects actual resource investment that relates to quality. |
| When discussing financial matters where wealth or financial track record is directly relevant to the claim. |
| When using cost as one factor among many in decision-making, not as proof of superiority. |
| You might notice yourself feeling more trusting of someone's opinion after learning they are wealthy or successful, even when their success is unrelated to the topic at hand. |
| Pay attention to moments when the price of something is doing most of the persuasive work -- when you are choosing the expensive option primarily because it is expensive. |
| Watch for the assumption that financial success means someone has figured things out in a general sense, rather than in the specific domain where they made their money. |
| Notice if you are reverse-engineering virtue from wealth -- assuming that rich people must have better values, habits, or insight, rather than just more money. |
| Dismissing all price-quality correlations as fallacious -- in some markets, particularly those with tight feedback loops, price really does track quality reasonably well. |
| Ignoring that financial track records can be relevant evidence when the topic is finance itself -- a successful investor talking about investing is different from that same investor talking about medicine. |
| Swinging to the opposite extreme and assuming that wealth always indicates something negative, which is just this fallacy in reverse. |
| Appeal to Wealth |
|---|
| Arguing that a claim is more likely to be true, or a position more likely to be correct, because it is associated with wealth, expensive items, or wealthy individuals, rather than evaluating the claim on its merits. |
| Wealth and truth are logically independent. Having money doesn't make someone's arguments correct, nor does the cost of something establish its quality or validity. Financial success may result from many factors unrelated to the truth of one's beliefs or the merit of one's arguments. |
Hover to see definition, click to view full details